There will be on update on GNW Packs but its gonna be wrose there are gonna be less pack for the winning group with better items in it :C xd

Who stated this, Mods don't normally release this information till hours before it is released?

Its official it was said when they first released 2.0 but isnt on live servers yet .

4."Elite/Hero/Legendary Feat Gift Pack"are the rewards for the Last 16 rounds, if you clear it, more rewards will be added to the Elite/Hero/Legendary Feat Gift Pack; each time you clear one of the phases of rounds of the Great Ninja War, the number of gift packs given to your Group will be reduced as you advance through the rounds, but the rewards in each gift pack will increase!;

So what happens if only 2 groups join the war?
Do both get the base rewards or do they get the top rewards
(base is the 1 for top 16)(top is the one for finale and/or winner)
And same question with only 1 group joining

More packs is better than less packs :l

But everyone DO get something, in the form of group token and contribution. It's not much but it is SOMETHING.

That said, while I would always love more rewards, I have to vote against this suggestion and for keeping the current schema for two reasons:
1. For the vast majority of servers, GNW doesn't contain 8 groups. Having fixed number of packs per group will therefore incentive players staying in different group instead of all flocking to one or two group, which makes for very bad competition. People often complain about their server being dead due to low number of group, despite the fact that there might be a very high active player count, just that they are all in one or two group (who are full of actives). Giving out more per group and/or giving outs stuff to every participant will only make it worse on this aspect.
2. Server vs Server balancing. Currently, active servers have huge advantages over inactive server, chief among them being whether sage is enabled, but there could be other factors. Inactive server, however, will most likely have more packs per person from GNW compared to active server, even if they do tend to also have less groups (i.e. 30 people in 2 group is about 0.6 pack per person, where as 100 people in 4 groups is about 0.4 pack per person). We should not be making suggestions that makes disadvantaged server further disadvantaged.

That said, what I would support would be something like this:
Increase the number of pack per group (still fixed number, and no more than 20, for reason #1 stated above. Most server can't sustain 8 groups of 20+ active player so 20 should still encourage multiple smaller groups instead of a few big ones)

Allow giving each player a second/third/etc pack if and only if every player who have participated have received one/two/etc pack A player may not, however, receive legendary twice or more than two legendary plus hero pack and no more than 4 packs total (so 1 L+1 H +2 E is the best you can get, or you can have 2 H + 2 E etc). This is for reason #2 stated above, so smaller server will have a bit of a power boost. The 4 packs limit is reasonable considering even at 20 packs, that means you can only theoretically go over with 5 or less participant, which is unlikely if the group can scrap together enough activity to register. Frankly, any group that can register but have less than 5 GNW participant is probably one filled with alts for the activity and is attempting to scam the system, hence the limit.

I think they should just add a filter so you can only give 1 pack per week to a group member and just give more packs like 20 minimun seems fair.

If they continue to just not merge servers it may not matter XD my group one of the two that participate in GNW still and we have less than 10 live players show up to GNW. Maybe that's the new solution =(

I agree with the op, many of our guildies that participate and contribute to gnw and the guild in general aren't able to get packs. I believe it leaves a bad feeling for players that didn't receive a pack and makes the gaming experience less fun (also it's a bit stressful distributing them). I'm ok with something like more packs that have less rewards. This post was last edited by 189***@facebook at 2017-2-19 13:25

You can practice Pack Rotation, which I believe is pretty common among quite a few groups. They record down the names of who got / failed to get any packs and they rotate the packs around each war to make sure everyone can get a pack at least once every 2/3 weeks.