Reply
Views: 1386 | Replies: 10
[ Other ] Merges ..

 [

Copy Link

]

  • Registered: 2017-07-24
  • Topics: 4
  • Posts: 18
On 2017-04-10 15:21:25Show this Author OnlyDescending Order
1# Go To

I looked s139,s142,146,151 which will get merge tomorrow s139 got 36 players on sage world our server s194 got no sage world last 2 weeks and i know there are many servers worse than ours , keep going oasis now i know u dont even look our requests lol

  • Registered: 2017-07-24
  • Topics: 18
  • Posts: 268
On 2017-04-10 16:19:22Show this Author Only
2#
ikr . my server (s242) literally has 24 actives. 24. no sage world . only one group and no merge? really? lol
  • Registered: 2017-07-24
  • Topics: 822
  • Posts: 939
On 2017-04-10 16:35:07Show this Author Only
3#
same situation in s298 , we didn't have sage for the last 2-3 weeks
  • Registered: 2017-07-24
  • Topics: 12
  • Posts: 854
On 2017-04-10 16:36:35Show this Author Only
4#
I see what Oasis is trying to do.

I think they're trying to salvage the semi-dead servers that barely gets a Sage World going. I don't think they're going to prioritise those pretty much dead. Merging 4 pretty much dead servers just gets you a new semi-dead server. Whereas merging a 4 semi-dead servers gets you something somewhat alive.
Which sort of makes sense to me. Imagine 4 servers of average 10 per battlefield in Sage world gets merged. The new Sage world should technically get approximately 40 per battlefield. Wheras imagine 4 servers of no Sage world gets merged, the new Sage world might only have 10-15 per battlefield, cause the individual servers were dead to begin with, and having this merge brings them to Square 1... a semi-dead server.

Although I see where they are coming from, at the same time, from my point of view, do the merge like what they are doing, BUT merge possibly 2-3 more dead servers into these mix. That way they can save whatever is left of the dead server instead of making them wait another 2 weeks which might still not merge them, or just result in players quitting.

S139 never made a request to merge in the Merge Thread dated 20th March.

1. Server ID: S142
2. Server Region: UK
3. Server Age: Estimated 5+ months
4. Sage Battlefield: has always opened so far, but very few players in each battlefield. We keep fighting the same people all the time, every single SW fighting the same enemies.
5. Time taken to kill World Boss: ~13 minutes
6. World Boss HP on Tuesday: ~66M
7. No. of group participating in Great Ninja War: 3 (with the same one always winning)
8. Average Power Rank of Top 5, Top 10, Top 20 : AVG Top 5 : 53.5K, AVG top 10 : 51.4K, AVG Top 20 : 48.7K
1. Server ID: S146
2. Server Region: UK
3. Server Age: 6+ months
4. Sage Battlefield: Only 2 out of 3 completed
5. Time taken to kill World Boss: 10 minutes +/-
6. World Boss HP on Tuesday : Unsure
7. No. of group participating in Great Ninja War: 3 (10+ members in each)
8. Average Power Rank of Top 5, Top 10, Top 20 : AVG Top 5 : 50K, AVG top 10 : 46K, AVG Top 20 : 42k1.Server ID: S151 Charmeleon
2.Server Region: UK
3.Server Age: Estimated 6 Months
4.Sage Battlefield: 8-12 participants per battlefield
5.Time to Kill World Boss: 10min
6.World Boss Hp: 47m
7.Number of Groups participatingin Great Ninja War: 2
8.Average power Rank Top 5, Top 10, Top 20:
AVG Top 5: 50k
AVG Top 10: 47k
AVG Top 20: 44k
  • Registered: 2017-07-24
  • Topics: 7
  • Posts: 22
On 2017-04-10 17:03:22Show this Author Only
5#
Im from S139, and as Jeremy mentionned above none of us had asked for merge in the previous merge request thread.

And I can tell you clearly we answered no for merge when dat assumed Oasis' employee(called "OasisAmbassador") came to our server for a survey for an eventual merge. We have 3 groups on the server, and we can start every sages since the begining of the server, so comparing with other servers which need acutal merge, we're satisfied enough with it. I talked with 2 other groups' leader after dat survey, they both answered no for merge as well.

So may i know why are we still on the merge list? I just dont get the point, if you're doing a survey for merge, take in account our opinions at least. If you don't care about it, why did u waste our time for a false survey? This post was last edited by all***@gmail.com at 2017-4-10 17:04
  • Registered: 2017-07-24
  • Topics: 4
  • Posts: 18
On 2017-04-10 17:11:05Show this Author Only
6#
  • LuneLight On 2017-04-10 17:03:22
  • Im from S139, and as Jeremy mentionned above none of us had asked for merge in the previous merge request thread.

    And I can tell you clearly we answered no for merge when dat assumed Oasis' employee(called "OasisAmbassador") came to our server for a survey for an eventual merge. We have 3 groups on the server, and we can start every sages since the begining of the server, so comparing with other servers which need acutal merge, we're satisfied enough with it. I talked with 2 other groups' leader after dat survey, they both answered no for merge as well.

    So may i know why are we still on the merge list? I just dont get the point, if you're doing a survey for merge, take in account our opinions at least. If you don't care about it, why did u waste our time for a false survey? This post was last edited by all***@gmail.com at 2017-4-10 17:04
i think they are doing it randomly lol they dont care what we are thinking
  • Registered: 2017-07-24
  • Topics: 2
  • Posts: 85
On 2017-04-10 18:06:41Show this Author Only
7#
been askin one at 262 for a while and we get skipped for older ones at 269 etc?.... wtf ;o

258,265 also asked for one :o we cud even be added to that 269 list if a 280 gets added... meah pretty sure no more spendin from any1 on 262 we already given up xD was good while it lasted o.o no point increasing power with no events or players..

This post was last edited by misakomomo at 2017-4-10 18:32
  • Registered: 2017-07-24
  • Topics: 12
  • Posts: 59
On 2017-04-10 18:22:41Show this Author Only
8#
  • LuneLight On 2017-04-10 17:03:22
  • Im from S139, and as Jeremy mentionned above none of us had asked for merge in the previous merge request thread.

    And I can tell you clearly we answered no for merge when dat assumed Oasis' employee(called "OasisAmbassador") came to our server for a survey for an eventual merge. We have 3 groups on the server, and we can start every sages since the begining of the server, so comparing with other servers which need acutal merge, we're satisfied enough with it. I talked with 2 other groups' leader after dat survey, they both answered no for merge as well.

    So may i know why are we still on the merge list? I just dont get the point, if you're doing a survey for merge, take in account our opinions at least. If you don't care about it, why did u waste our time for a false survey? This post was last edited by all***@gmail.com at 2017-4-10 17:04
If S139 have heavy spenders (atleast 1) then there is your answer :)
  • Registered: 2017-07-24
  • Topics: 33
  • Posts: 250
On 2017-04-10 22:43:06Show this Author Only
9#
I guess they take first 3-4 servers in order . Like 139 , 142 , 146 , 151 from each region... So i can say yo got lucky :) This post was last edited by cretude at 2017-4-10 22:47
  • Registered: 2017-07-24
  • Topics: 34
  • Posts: 4320
On 2017-04-11 09:52:00Show this Author Only
10#
Hey

Unfortunately, the decision for the mergers has been made.
We can't change it once it's in the process.

I'm sorry you feel that way.
Reply
Quicky Post
Reply

Log in in order to Post. | Register