Its small price for the coupons you get, Right? ;P

true, but that's not my point. :)

point is.. we're being cheated ! :@

spend all your coins till you see the bug solved

did you actually lose coins thou?
for all we know, the mail is badly translated and is only intended to mean the other guy gained coins...

sadly i did not keep track of my coins before and after being challenged.

if i knew for sure, i would have submitted a bug report instead.. :(

its correct.
under wanted status, a plunderer might be atked by other players.

"If this player loses when challenged, he will not lose anything" -> other player attack u and he lose. he will not lost anything. u will also not lost anything.

"if he win, he will got some coins" -> you will lost your coins.

So if u are in wanted and you lost to someone, you should lost 50k coins and they gain 50k coins.
thats afaik hahaha no one atk me yet :p

"when challenged"
means it's looking from the prospective of the defender, so assuming translation is correct, your understanding is wrong.

"If this player loses when challenged, he will not lose anything" -> other player attack u and he lose. he will not lost anything. u will also not lost anything.

challenged would refer to the plunderer here.

"this player" referring to the attacker.

if it was referring to the defender(plunderer), they would have said "plunderer" instead of "player" as you can see on all the sentence above.

i think they refer to the attacker not plunderer.
as if it was refer to the plunderer they will write "plunderer" instead of "this player"

well its just my opinion.

it would not be grammatically correct, but then again... this game....

yup the translation is abit emm ambiguous..
nevertheless the game is soo good and if can u need to do plunder. its free 150 coupon xD

"If this player loses when challenged, he will not lose anything" -> other player attack u and he lose. he will not lost anything. u will also not lost anything.

dude.. how can the attacker be challenged. he is the challenger.
this "player" is challenged, therefore he is not the challenger, which is not the attacker.
simple english.

Only problem I have with this, is the ability to challenge someone that is doing something. I'm not sure if this is a bug, maybe someone can tell me if it is, but when I was doing the Anko test, I got attacked mid question, they refreshed, and I lost credit for the question. I'm fine fighting randomly, I'm fine losing coins, cause I gained more then I lost, I would even be fine if I had to fight at any time like during a quiz. But what I'm not ok with, is losing out on one of my questions because of it.

Well, this would be the ONLY way to punish the #1 player in each server should they choose to plunder. So while unintended, it kinda make sense?

Besides, it's not a huge deal, you c*ways do the exam before you do plunder. I think it's the only activity that is vulnerable to this issue.

This happened to me last night.

If you went to do anko test while carrying goods, you deserved it lol.

Dosnt work like that, Basicly if YOU plunder you end up with "wanted" status afterwards. This means ANYONE can challenge you when they see you in the world map and you can not refuse. If they beat you they take your coins.

punish the #1 as they chose to plunder? good you are not part of the dev team, else u will just delete their accounts :P